The natural limits of the human body make us vulnerable and therefore dependent throughout our lives on others. Yet American law and policy disregard these stubborn facts with statutes and judicial decisions that presume people to be autonomous defined by their capacity to choose. As legal scholar O. Carter Snead points out this individualistic ideology captures important truths about human freedom but it also means that we have no obligations to each other unless we actively voluntarily embrace them.<br><br><br><br><I>What It Means to Be Human</I> makes the case for a new paradigm one that better represents the gifts and challenges of being human. Inspired by the insights of Alasdair MacIntyre and Charles Taylor Snead proposes a vision of human identity and flourishing that supports those who are profoundly vulnerable and dependent—children the disabled and the elderly. To show how such a vision would affect law and policy he addresses three complex issues in bioethics: abortion assisted reproductive technology and end-of-life decisions. He concludes that if the law is built on premises that reflect the fully lived reality of life it will provide support for the vulnerable including the unborn mothers families and those nearing the end of their lives.
